# Error bounds for second order approximation

Where here we prove an approximation bound for twice continuously differentiable functions with *M*-Lipschitzian Hessian, that is for all . In particular, we show that for all

This is stated as Lemma 1.2.4 in: Y. Nesterov, *Introductory Lectures on Convex Optimization – A basic course*, Kluwer Ac. Publishers, 2004. Continue reading →

# Weak closure points not attainable as limits of sequences

Where in this post we discover an uncanny property of the weak topology: the points of the weak closure of a set cannot always be attained as limits of elements of the set. Naturally, the w-closure of a set is weakly closed. The so-called weak sequential closure of a set, on the other hand, is the set of cluster points of sequences made with elements from that set. The new set is not, however, weakly sequentially closed, which means that there may arise new cluster points; we may, in fact, have to take the weak sequential closure trans-finitely many time to obtain a set which is weakly sequentially closed – still, this may not be weakly closed. Continue reading →

# Graphical convergence

Where in this post we wonder whether pointwise convergence makes sense for sequences of set-valued mappings. We present some essential limitations of the pointwise limit and we motivate the notion of graphical convergence. What is more, we use animated GIFs to better illustrate and understand these new notions. Continue reading →

# Pretty convexity result

Where here we discover some interesting facts about continuous convex functions.

We know that a function is convex if

for all and .

We see that if is a continuous function, then an equivalent condition for convexity is that either of the following inequalities holds

# The Mittag-Leffler function

Mostly known as the man because of whom mathematicians are not entitled to the Nobel prize, the Swedish mathematician GĂ¶sta Mittag-Leffler, the man who – the legend has it – had an affair with Nobel’s wife, is little known for his namesake function (for the record, Nobel never had a wife). The Mittag-Leffler function arises in several applications in physics and mathematics, chiefly in the solution of fractional-order differential equations – a well-studied special type of integrodifferential equations [1]. The function is given in the form of an infinite convergent series. A straightforward way to compute then would be to sum up the terms of this series until, eventually, the sum does not change. This, however, would be neither fast not accurate. In this article we are discussing about numerical methods for the computation of the Mittag-Leffler function. Continue reading →

# Firmly nonexpansive but not contractive

Some notes on firm nonexpansiveness and contractiveness. We give an example of a firmly nonexpansive operator *F* so that *I*–*F *is injective and *F* is not a contraction. Continue reading →

# Local boundedness of set-valued functions

Local boundedness is an important property of set-valued functions and it is the missing piece of the puzzle in the study of semicontinuity. A function is locally bounded at a point if the images of some neighbourhoods of this point are bounded sets. We see how the assumption of local boundedness leads to some very useful properties related to semicontinuity of , of its inverse and more. Continue reading →

# Inner and Outer Semicontinuity of Multifunctions

Where in this post we introduce the notions of *inner* and *outer **semicontinuity* for multi-valued functions using the PainlevĂ©-Kuratowski notion of set-convergence which we introduced previously. We then provide a few useful characterisations of (semi)continuity for multi-valued mappings. We discuss the similarities and differences between these definitions and there counterparts for single-valued functions. Continue reading →

# On Set Convergence III

Where in this, third and final, post on the topic of set convergence we introduce the notion of Painleve-Kuratowski convergence of sequences of sets in topological spaces and we discuss about the unique properties of this notion of converges. We see that the K-limit of a constant sequence may not be equal to the elements of that sequence and many other interesting properties. Continue reading →

# On Set Convergence II

This post comes as a sequel of On Set Convergence I where we introduced some necessary notions that are useful for studying how sets converge in a topological space. Alongside, we provided two non-topological definitions of convergence, namely the limits inferior and superior. In this post we will delve a bit further into the topological properties of the inner and outer limits of sequences of sets. Continue reading →